TO BE UPDATED…………..
CRYPTOLOGICAL PHYSICS.
After struggling for decades trying to explain that the origination of life is of sensitive cause and not merely accidental I can confidently claim that I have now the necessary understanding to convince the general public irrefutably by demonstrating a coding experiment in collaboration with our local Harris museum and art gallery in Preston, Lancashire, UK. I haven’t yet decided a date when to make the arrangements for this experiment, but it would be definitely early 2024, presuming that I am able to attract people to help me conducting it and I have yet to advertise it on our website.
I need someone who knows the rules of Scrabble game as well as experience so that they can check the clarity of the activity as we are playing and to take part in the game with myself – as I am trying to demonstrate a trick. Also I need a fair number of audience not only to watch both of us playing, but as well as to witness the development of the game so that you can convince the general public that this trick is possible with Scrabble with strict rules and hopefully established with confidence for the library records for future studies. Of course this is not some illusionist concoction because I am not physically manipulating the board pieces in any way in the course of the game. This is essentially a coding experimentation according to the design of the English language and with subsequent implications for all other human languages as well, possibly for devising similar sort of cryptic games followingly. Essentially what the trick is that we will be setting up a game involving two players and I will be one of the players and throughout the course of the game I will fix it in such a way that we will get the word “Joke” at the end of the game, of course not necessarily the exact spelling of the word but close. But this trick is only possible if we adhere to strict rules, correct spelling of the words, exact rules and also following turns in the right order when picking pieces from the bag to refill the rack, ensuring the equality of chances.
It must be assured that this is not a false alarm than may be liable to be physically risky to people in any way like in the story “Cry wolf”. I have attempted this experiment four times before and first three times were successful, but the fourth time I have gone stray with the rules and it didn’t work. So I am cautioning you in advance to be very observant as we are proceeding with the experiment.
My background is physics and mathematics and this specific exercise is to test my hypothesis that it is possible to predict physical phenomena in terms of coding as well as numerically. Encryption is naturally related to life at any physical scale of the universe and that is the motive for devising this experiment. Language being authentic in nature is how life is to be possible on Earth. Our human languages are designed categorically analogous to the phenomenon of genetic coding. There is nothing arbitrary about our human feelings and affairs, because our behaviour is accountable according to the design of the languages in relation to all the cultures in the world. Encryption both in the arts and languages is for bookkeeping for the manifestation of life to be sensible. This is rather similar to the mathematical bookkeeping to predict the physical phenomena of the universe. We already know that genetic coding is for determining the features of a living features of a living body. And also supposedly astrological coding is for ordaining the future bearings to all life collectively on the planet Earth. Analogously, the Scrabble game as a linguistic model represents a system of coding for generating reflections, not predictions, of our human affairs within the intermediary physical scale of the universe. Coding is purely qualitative and is irrespective of the difference between big and small. Because it equally applies to atoms and molecules on the small scale and celestial bodies on the large scale as well as apples and monkeys at the intermediary scale. I am really conducting a scientific experiment to test my hypothesis of natural coding involving humans and natural tools only and no technical devices as on conventional terms. My ambition is to revitalise natural power enabling the redemption of life on Earth from the technological surrealism that we are currently enshrouded with. Coding and encryption is not purely human invention to facilitate espionage and secret communication during war times, because it is all originally natural heritage for life to be physically possible on our planet.
Languages are not designed randomly according to people hailing from different regions of the world with no apparent natural purpose. Otherwise communication would be dysfunctional even for the very secular way of the world. Our human affairs materialise according to the encryption rules, but not as clues. In other words coding is strictly for monitoring our human affairs only rather than for deciding anything of grave concern. This is in fact analogous to in physics monitoring natural phenomena numerically. Whereas generally in science predictability is numerical correspondingly distinguishability of living bodies is only possible by coding. The features of a living body is determined by the coding conventions of the molecular bonding to the chromosome structure. It does not suggest that if a person is seemingly appears to be physically ugly to some people mean that they are morally inferior or liable to be sinister in some way. Whether nature is numerical or coding it constitutes some frame of reference for evincing the sense of diversity. As long as we do not dismiss our human feelings and relationships are merely arbitrary then we can appreciate that life is cryptological in nature – as environmental conditions are numerical.
The great physicist Galileo said that “the book of nature is written in the language of mathematics”. But Galileo’s perception of reality is very one-sided as required for the reductionist way of thinking dismissing life as irrelevant. Our human languages are the holographic perspective of nature the flip side to the mathematical mind. This is rather synonymous to the saying that “love is the other side to the same coin” – at least biologically. Holistic means that our human affairs somehow must be mirrored (referenced) by the events of the physical world evoking sentience and for life to be considered as sensible at all. The conventional definition of the holistic is “the whole is greater than the sum of its parts”. Therefore for any scope of knowledge that is not numerically intelligible the only other possible cognitive channel is the study of codes, cryptology. Nature has to be bi-orientational, life and the physical world. In physics prediction is numerical resolution, but biological distinguishability is holographic coding. Unlike mathematics, language is of holographic cognition to explain life.
Every physical phenomenon is rendered according to some coding convention, irrespective of the physical scale. As Darwin explains in his theory of evolution creatures develop new bodily facilities in order to adapt to the changes in environmental conditions, altering the genes of organisms in the process producing offsprings of different species. This argument suggests that coding convention is also realised in the environmental processes at the large scale and not purely confined to the molecular bonding of the chromosome structure and that it can be reprogrammed. Because life is not numbers modelled by equations (mathematical) but coding for bookkeeping (notational). Unlike mechanisms, conventions do not depend on space and time, at least in nature if not in our social mentality. Environmental conditions changing the genetic program and causing the organism to develop new bodily facilities is contrary to the conventional reductionist way of thinking that small scale phenomena determining that of the large scale. Both communication between individuals (large scale) and the features of an individual (small scale) are determined in terms of coding. Also logically coding can be translated reversibly between the sequencing of the genes and geometrical signalling. This is rather analogous to the modulation between digital (binary) and analog (infinitesimal) signals for electronic purposes. In nature communication and reproduction are equally possible in either digital or analog modes. However, Richard Dawkins argues in his book “The Extended Phenotype” that the study of organism should include analysis of how its genes affect the surrounding environment, in the reductionist way. Both genetic engineering and social interbreeding change the programming encoded in the chromosome structure with certain bearing on the environmental conditions.